This seems like a pretty simple, straightforward question, but it is a pretty difficult question to answer. While we can assume that terrorists are interested in the same things as we are (money, power, and prestige), they are not the same. We can also assume that they are motivated by some other threat than just money. For example, terrorists could be motivated by the fear of poverty or the fear of having to deal with an authoritarian government.
However, we must also remember that they are not the same as the people we deal with every day on a daily basis. We can’t just take the threat of terrorism in an attack and assume that it has the same impact we feel when confronted with the threat of being robbed or having our lives put under surveillance. It’s also important to note that terrorism is a political concept, which is why we talk about how terrorists seek political goals.
Terrorism and terrorism are two different things. Terrorists want to create fear in their own people. In other words, they are willing to use violence to achieve political goals. Terrorism is a political concept in which a government puts itself in a situation in which it has to take on a state of war with a hostile force that wants to destroy it.
There’s a lot of discussion regarding the impact terrorism has on business. Sometimes it’s an easy case to make. A terrorist bombing could result in the deaths of hundreds, making business and travel unsafe. At other times, the impact of terrorism is more difficult to quantify. That’s because people’s actions change not just the lives of people and businesses, but their own personal and political identities as well.
For example, a terrorist attack on the WTC would cost billions of dollars in damage and casualties. It would likely have a ripple effect on the financial markets, and people would be scared to do business or travel, especially people who might be involved in commerce. But a terrorist attack on a nuclear power plant would probably cost less. And the impact on our own personal lives might be harder to quantify, but could be substantial.
This is the case for the threat of terrorism. With an attack such as 9/11, terrorism has spread to more places than any previous attack. The US is currently dealing with large-scale terrorist attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan. And we are certainly still dealing with the potential threat of terrorism from Iran.
When we talk about terrorism, we’re not talking about people who choose to carry out attacks based on some religious ideology. We are talking about people who choose to attack a place and people who attack a person. The difference between the two may be that, while the former can be resolved with a simple “kill the bad guy”, the latter requires a more complex “kill the bad guy”.
We also have to consider that in the case of terrorism, the cost of a successful attack ranges from zero to the cost of making a big movie.
We’ve seen the cost of terrorists on our own news broadcasts, but our experience tells us that the cost of terrorism is often more than you’d expect. The cost of a successful attack ranges from a few hundred dollars to the cost of making a big movie, and the cost of losing an attack ranges from the cost of making a big movie to the cost of making a movie that is more successful.
What the government seems to be trying to do is to make the cost of terrorism so high that the average American is afraid to do business with someone who is a terrorist. This is a problem because if the cost of terrorism is so high that most business owners and employees don’t want to work with someone who is a terrorist, it means that terrorists are probably already out there. So if we want to get rid of terrorism, we have to get rid of the terrorists.